This week, I read an article from the New York Times "On the Runway" blog. The post I interpreted was by Cathy Horyn and was titled "Prada: Working Girl." In the article, Cathy describes the Prada Spring 2014 runway show and shares her thoughts about it. I've separated Cathy's vivid language into 5 categories: silhouette, details, color, fabric, and creative jargon. This break down should help everyone better understand fashion language, and get a feel for what the overall appearance of the Prada runway show was like.
- Silhouette - sleeveless, dresses, leg warmers, web sandal, box-pleated skirts, schoolgirlish coats, shift and coat shapes, simple sportswear, shifts, coats, bags
- Details - ribbed, sports elements, varsity stripes, box-pleated, freckled with colored stones, chunky embroidery, printed
- Color - colored stones
- Fabric - viscose knits, wools, screen-printed silks, printed mink
- Creative Jargon - schoolgirlish, femininity, lavish compositions, transparently muscular, feminine portraits, poster art
Here are some of the shots I liked best from the Prada show...
Overall, I was impressed by Ms. Horyn's writing. Her use of descriptive words is out of this world. I'm impressed by and respect her vocabulary. She paints a picture of this runway show with ease. However, I was surprised by her lack of color language in this article. The only word she used to describe the colors in this show was, in fact, a pretty vague word, "colored." This could mean many things to a reader (multi-colored, red-colored, complementary-colored -- which one is it?). To a reader with limited visuals this could pose a problem.
After looking at the show in its entirety, I think color plays an important factor in this show. Prada used a wide range of colors in this collection. Dull neutrals like deep army green, grays, and blacks were mixed with pieces of richly colored hues like bright yellow, pumpkin orange, and cobalt blue.
Other than the lack of color emphasis in Cathy's article, I really enjoy what she has to say. I agree with some of her opinions on this show, like how she wasn't crazy about Miuccia Prada's use of graphic portraits. Something about this Prada show just wasn't on point for me. I think the collection had a little too much of a mishmash of different design elements. Prada's designs were a little too out there for me, and that's coming from someone who usually appreciates a crazy runway show.
Other than the lack of color emphasis in Cathy's article, I really enjoy what she has to say. I agree with some of her opinions on this show, like how she wasn't crazy about Miuccia Prada's use of graphic portraits. Something about this Prada show just wasn't on point for me. I think the collection had a little too much of a mishmash of different design elements. Prada's designs were a little too out there for me, and that's coming from someone who usually appreciates a crazy runway show.